soggy.
Most of the time,
We do not see things
as they are, but as we are
So, believing is
seeing. And not seeing is believing.
Given this perception of ‘reality’ how do we see our future?
The above question was posed last night by the Chancelor of the university I work for. It made me think and I started contemplating on the question. I picked my thoughts and below was my response verbatim.
"Perhaps an existentialist perspective may give an insight to this dilemma, where it assumes the individual exist first and then they define their essence through choice and action. Prescriptively the individual should have the freedom of choice and be accountable for its outcome. Hence indivduals create their own purpose.
Therefore the phrase believing is seeing tend to incline towards the existentialist view, where it acknowledges the nuances of subjectivity as to how one interpretes and develops a world view.
In the case of seeing is believing, it is constructed within the boundary of empiricism, hence it may restrict thought processess within a known realm. As for existentialism it encourages individuals to go beyond observation and actively engage in the pursuit of "meaning."
"The self consiousness we ought to consider, not as a new consiousness, but as the only mode of existence which is possible for a consciousness of something." - Satre.
Satre expounds, that there is a need for a core awareness in order to to have the awareness of experience (which he terms it as pre-reflective self consciousness). This is the concept called 'Vokhta" in the Katha Upanishad.
So, the future, perhaps is a construct that one pursues.
We are at the cusp of the end of 2023, another year had passed, i ask myself, where am i, where am i going, and the most important of all, who am i?
The journey continues.........
Cheers to Everyone.
ravivarmmankkanniappan@1304301220233.0567° N, 101.5851° E
Note:
No other period in the world best
describes corruption than ancient Rome. Corruption in Rome basically stems from
its own political, economic, and social structures. The Roman empire was
bequeathed with vast wealth, which fueled bribery, favoritism, and embezzlement
among officials vying for power. Patronage networks and nepotism was the order
of the day which then promoted cronyism. Since the Roman Senate had an absolute
power without punity it only further promoted abuse. In the end owing to
economic inequality, unchecked power dynamics, and a tolerant culture towards unethical
practices, contributed to the pervasive corruption that eventually led to the
collapse of the Roman Republic.
It was during the late 1st
century BCE, corruption became particularly pronounced. Personas like Julius
Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus faced allegations of corruption, bribery, and
manipulation of political processes. And The First Triumvirate, a political
alliance between Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus, was marked as the peak of corruption in the Roman
Empire.
Meanwhile in U.S.A Inc., a young
country, that was established out of rebellion from a corrupt Europe has not
been spared of the disease called corruption either. Though generally ranks
lower on global corruption indices compared to many other countries, but USA is
not free from corrupt and unethical conduct. In the USA corruption takes
various forms, including bribery, fraud, embezzlement, and other forms of
misconduct. Both Public officials and private individuals have been indicted
over the course of American history involving scandals such as lobbying
influence, campaign finance concerns, and conflicts of interest.
One notable instance of
corruption in the early days of the USA was the Yazoo land scandal (1795–1796).
Georgia legislators were bribed to sell vast tracts of public land to private
companies at significantly reduced prices. The scandal exposed corruption in
land transactions and led to legal battles and political repercussions. The
dilemma of corruption in the USA today, lies in balancing its robust legal and
institutional framework with instances of public and corporate misconduct.
Striking a balance between effective enforcement, transparency, and preventive
measures has become a crucial element in maintaining public trust and the
integrity of democratic institutions.
In India however, corruption
stems from a combination of factors, including bureaucratic inefficiency, low
salaries fostering a temptation for bribery, political corruption intertwining
with business interests, lack of transparency in government operations, wide
economic disparities prompting corrupt practices for survival, weak law
enforcement fostering a culture of impunity, a complex regulatory environment
providing opportunities for corruption, cultural acceptance and historical
tolerance for informal networks, and the role of money in politics influencing
policy decisions.
Did the British Raj have anything
to do with the current quagmire in India, perhaps yes. Not with-standing the
fact that corrupt practice is an inherent human behavior that stems from greed,
which is an internal force, but via the British Raj much of the corrupt
practice in India got an institutional condonement. The British introduced a centralized
administrative system, concentrating power in the hands of a few, in which it
had opportunities for corruption and abuse of power. The British also employed
a policy of "divide and rule," creating divisions among various communities.
This strategy indeed had contributed to social and political fragmentation,
fostering an environment conducive to corruption. The colonial economic
policies, such as the extraction of resources for the British Rajs’ benefit,
definitely have contributed to economic disparities and a sense of
exploitation, potentially fostering corrupt practices. The British also did not
prioritize widespread education in India during the early part of their rule,
which limited the opportunities for social and economic advancement,
potentially contributing to conditions conducive to corruption. Finally, the
imposition of foreign legal and administrative systems did create a gap between
the rulers and the ruled, with potential consequences for corruption.
Though these colonial legacies had
contributed to corruption, but post-independence factors, such as political,
economic, and social dynamics, have played a significant role in the subsequent
state of affairs of the country. The relationship between colonialism and
corruption is multifaceted, and understanding it requires a nuanced examination
of historical contexts and local realities.
In addressing this multifaceted
issues, India and the Indian government need a comprehensive effort, which
includes legal reforms, institutional strengthening, transparency promotion,
and a cultural shift towards accountability.
After much neglect, I believe it
was PM Modi who has given priority to the eradication of corruption as one of
the main agenda of the state. Modi's government has implemented measures to
address corruption, such as demonetization, the Goods and Services Tax (GST)
for tax reform, and initiatives like Digital India. Further anti-corruption initiatives,
including the introduction of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, aim to strengthen
the framework, have been put in place to deal with this systemic problem.
However, the effectiveness of
these measures have been subject to much debate, and critics argue that
challenges continue to persist towards operationalizing it in order to achieve
the desired outcome.
Moral of the story, personal greed promotes corrupt actions. Be it at the highest level, or to the lowest echelon of socioeconomic position, when an individual is driven by greed nothing can stop the voracity of the desire that follows. Established rules and laws can only be a reminder but cannot be an absolute deterrent. Only self-awareness through personal convictions towards ethical behavior can make a definitive change towards establishing a society which is lesser burdened by corrupt practices.
A quote from the Mahabratham, where this verse illustrates
the perpetuation of violence; the wounds caused by anger and aggression must be
addressed and often result in further conflict.
Thus is the story of the current conflict in Gaza.
One of the bloodiest IRA/British Government conflict that
took place during ‘The Troubles’ was the Bloody Sunday (January 30th, 1972) incident,
which todate, we can see the repercussion where the social segregation between
the Catholics and Protestants is still very much alive. Housing segregation
between both these communities with walls dividing them is an accepted norm.
Bitter feuds and conflicts often have enduring consequences
that can indeed remain deeply embedded in the collective and individual psyche,
affecting behavior and attitudes long after the events have occurred.
Resolving bitter feuds requires active efforts towards
reconciliation, forgiveness, and healing. These processes often involve
acknowledging the past, promoting dialogue, understanding different
perspectives, and working toward a shared understanding of the causes and
effects of the conflict.
Unfortunately, in situations where historical feuds are
intertwined with socio-economic issues, coupled with power struggles between nations owing
to geopolitical interest, and vested corporate agenda, it only throws any reconciliatory
efforts wide open.
As mentioned in the 'Republic' by Plato, often attributed to
Socrates, “Only the dead have seen the end of the war”, it encapsulates the
enduring and cyclical nature of conflict. It implies that war and its
consequences persist across generations and time, highlighting the perpetual
and seemingly unending nature of conflicts.
Thus is the nature of mankind, cursed with the faculty to
think.
ravivarmmankkanniappan@0211202310133°10'46"N 101°32'55"E.
When I was
watching the movie BOBBY (a Hindi movie) way back in 1973, I was angry with the
antagonist Pran and his snobbish family who was deadly against the son Rishi
having a relationship with Dimple who is the daughter of a fisherman Premnath. Wealth
played a crucial role in the screenplay of most love stories in Indian cinemas
(be it Tamizh, Telugu, Marathi or others) before or even after the movie Bobby.
If not the boy, the gal hails from a wealthy family, hence the resistance, and
the entire story would revolve around the tribulations (including the trees) of
the couple in overcoming all the adversaries before eventually leading to a
happy ending. Of course I must say there were also movies that had a tragic end
too.
The theme revolving
around class conflict of rich versus poor was so camouflaged when the
underlying issue was of another social construct that mainstream cinema
skirted. Except for a few art movies, mainstream Indian movies preferred to use
“Rich Vs Poor” theme rather than addressing the topic of “caste”. It was almost as if nobody can see the
elephant or even wanted to see the elephant that was right in front of them but
preferred to paint the elephant as though it was a wall.
Hence the
notion of Rich Vs Poor struck a cord in Indian cinema. So much so the famous
Tamizh actor M.G. Ramachandran rode on this theme, won the hearts of the people
of Tamizh Nadu to eventually becoming the Chief Minister of the state.
As India
progressed economically from the 90’s onwards, the whole perspective of earning
moved from survival to the pursuit of wealth. Opportunities in the Gulf States
for semi-skilled and skilled workers drove millions of Indians to seek higher earnings.
The scare of the Y2K bug or the Millennium Bug created opportunities for young computer
techies from India to move to the US and other parts of the world to fix the
feared anomaly. This was followed by an even bigger brain drain of Indian
professionals all over the world in search of higher earnings. Interestingly
enough much of the money earned is actually plowed back home which in turn
changes their wealth standing in their hometowns, back in India. The spinoff
effect is definitely exponential not only to the immediate families but also
towards the extended ones.
Though the
issue of caste is still a contentious issue in India, but owing to better
education and economic prosperity, at least in urban India, lifestyles and
relationships have changed and are continuing to do so.
The Indian movie
makers today cannot sell the old recycled theme of Rich Vs Poor anymore. On top
of that, Indian movies do not only sell in India but it has become a global
phenomenon owing to the spread of the Indian diaspora. The recent release of
the Tamizh movie “Jailer”, as I write, is going to cross US80million mark with its
world wide release 17 days ago. The Hindi movie Pathan released a few months
ago had a worldwide collection of US130million. So Indian movies are a big deal
beyond India for movie makers.
That brings us
to my observation to the movie Greeja and I watched over the weekend, Rocky Aur
Rani Ki Prem Kahani, a Hindi romantic comedy. This is a typical Indian love
story with plenty of dance, songs and of course with Karan Johar (director of
the movie), the colour and grandiose was stupendous. Although it has the typical boy meets girl and
followed by the parental opposition, but the twist I saw in the opposition was
what made me think. It was not about Rich versus Poor, instead it was the Rich
Vs Cultured. On top of that, the hidden conflict is also not caste but
ethnicity, one being a rich (very rich) Punjabi family versus a highly
intellectual and cultured Bengali family. The dynamics here is completely dichotomous
and that makes this movie hilarious on one hand but also surfaces the changing
parameters in the sociocultural landscape of India, at least in one spectrum of
the society.
Wealth may
not justify prosperity but it has to be accompanied by a good read too. The
very existence of humanity does not merely lie on seeking wealth but the
pursuit of knowledge for knowledge sake, and appreciating the finer values that
are around us, culture, art, literature and other aspects of humanities that
completes us as social beings.
Though it is
premature to think that this phenomenon has mass reflection but the very effort
taken by the movie team would definitely sow the seeds for society to evolve in
that direction.
WE have
become slaves to our own inventions, life goes on every single day in a mechanistic
manner. People are more familiar with the smell of a burger than the fragrance
of a rose, or the sound of the traffic than the sound of a Myna bird. We are
trapped in our own vicious circle, and not willing to steer away from the herd,
we simply don’t want to be different because the consumerist ideology conditioned
in our mind prevents us from “thinking”.
So it is refreshing
once in a while to see mainstream entertainment reneged from the norm and
address an alternative view on life.
Go watch Rocky
Aur Rani Ki Prem Kahani, to cogitate over one’s own perspective, or otherwise
just enjoy a simple old fashion colourful Hindi movie.
Cheers.
ravivarmman@15152708233.0567° N, 101.5851° E